Navigation gone bad

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Really? Really.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

This is a new one: Jetta Sport Wagon 6MT - knee hits steering wheel

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Great trunk space in the 2010 lacrosse. Let the christmas shopping season begin.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Pet peeve redemption: at least I can see my speed

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Pet peeve alert in 2010 Buick Lacrosse

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Honda Crosstaur spotting on the Edens

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Love this placement of a cupholder in the toyota yaris liftback

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Still not a fan of the zebra-like lacquer ob the dash of the Mazda6

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Is this clock placement confusing?

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

All those red things on the nav screen in the e-class can't be a go od thing

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Love the "hand" that helps you with your seatbelt in the e-class

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Thinks this is one of the worst places ever for a cupholder

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Very disappointed with results of today's challenge. 58.7 mpg. Do o ver!

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Uh oh. On the trip back to the office dropped a couple more mpgs.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Quick trip to boss's house dropped the mpgs by 2. Eek!

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Off to a good start with today's prius fuel challenge.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Prius Fuel Challenge: Leg 4

OK, so this is it. My last chance to guzzle fuel in the 2010 Prius.

How did it go? Not well.

First of, in my defense, driving through Morton Grove is like driving through Fort Knox. There literally was a cop on every corner, so I was stuck at the 30 mph speed limit. And I didn't think erratic speeding up to a red light or stop sight would win me any points either. So, I was in power mode, windows down and low gear until I got to the highway. I kept the mpgs down around 34.

But once I got on the highway the mpg numbers started inching up. I would accelerate hard, speed for a couple miles and do it all again.

To no avail.

The results?

Total miles traveled in the day: 40.3
Final MPG: 35.9

The conclusion?

If I can't get the mileage below 30, I'm guess you won't either.

Next up? What's the best mileage this lead foot can get?

Prius Fuel Challenge: Leg 3

So, I set off to my gym in Morton Grove at about 8 p.m., and the traffic was light. I used that opportunity to accelerate quickly out of traffic lights and stop signs as well as do some aggressive passing on the highway. The windows were down, but I have to admit I switched the A/C to heat ... It got cold in Chicago when the sun went down!

The results?

Total miles: 29.7
Average MPG: 35.3

They started inching back up again! Jeesh, what's a lead foot gotta do to burn some fuel here?

Prius Fuel Challenge: Leg 2

OK. So, to and from lunch was a nice short trip, which is notoriously bad for gas mileage. Plus, I added about 300 pounds in passenger volume. Since we were on low mph surface streets I did kick the car down into low gear, and even though tweeter @ChevyHigh recommended flipping the car in neutral and revving the engine at a stop, that was easier said than done. The Prius engine just doesn't rev. But it did keep the engine on a little bit longer.

So, I managed to whittle away that high mileage ... but not nearly enough.

The new results?

Total miles traveled: 22.9
Average MPG: 34.1

Still not quite what I was looking for. But it kind of proves a point. Look for Leg 3 (from work to gym) and Leg 4 (from gym to home) later today ...

The challenge: The worst mileage I can get in a Prius (Leg 1)

So, everyone is always talking about how good the mileage is in the Prius. With a combined rating of 50 mpg, it's the most fuel efficient mass-produced gasoline vehicle currently available.

When I was on a recent launch for the vehicle, there were numbers like 70 mpg and even 90 mpg being floated around. But there was one guy who had a really different idea: What's the worst mileage you can get in a Prius. He ended up somewhere around 25 mpg.

I figure with my lead foot and in a city like Chicago, surely I could do much worse.

So today, I'm throwing down the gauntlet. What's the worst I can do?

Leg 1: The trip to work

On the way to work today from the north side of Chicago to Wilmette, I rolled down all my windows, cranked up the A/C, turned on power mode and gunned it out of every stoplight. There were also quite a few 80 mph stints on the highway and power passes, which I stopped after seeing several state troopers trolling about.

The result?

Miles traveled 13.6
Final mpg: 39.9 mpg.

Hmmmm. Not quite what I was looking for.

OK. I'm heading to lunch in a half hour. Any other tips to get those mpgs down?

Finally nice enough weather for a top down drive in the Z4.

-- Sent from my Palm Pre

Hot: behind the wheel gauges for the 2010 SRX

Not: behind the wheel gauges for the 2010 RX

Driving impressions of the Lincoln MKZ

I liked it. Really. But ...

It didn't thrill me. Not that every car can be a Porsche 911 Carrera 4S Cabriolet ... But still.

Since I loved the MKS, I had hoped for a little more from the petite MKZ. But it fell pretty flat. The seats were comfortable. The styling was attractive. The controls were functional and intuitive.

But still.

Acceleration was OK, and the overall facade was just plain conservative. Kind of an upscale Focus. For $42K. And I guess I've progressed beyond that. If I'm going to spend more than $40K on a car, I want pizzazz, style and something that has a bit of "see-me" in it.

I guess it would be fine for someone in business related job. Something where you don't really want to flaunt how much you're spending on a car. Classy, subtle, nondescript, borzzzzz ... Snooze. Sorry. Nodded off there.

The high point in the MKZ are the behind-the-wheel gauges, which are lifted neatly from the MKS. They're high tech, glistening and downright beautiful. A non sequitur for the rest of the car.

The verdict? It's a classic vehicle with nothing (and I do mean nothing) outstanding, dazzling or otherwise wow. Definitely not worth a $42K pricetag, and I think that's what turned me off the most.

Love it: The slick and glistening behind-the-wheel gauges.

Hate it: The boring shape that was mistaken more than once for a Ford Focus.

Can't live without it: Um, well, nothing actually. I could quite happily live without the MKZ.

Loved the 2010 Mustang

But the gauges were a bit of a disappointment. In fact, the KM numbers look like cheap stickers.

I dub thee Smurfette

New 2010 Jaguar XJ Revealed

Business as usual is over at GM ... huh?

What does that mean exactly? Personally, I don't think that's the best possible quote the communications department could have selected from GM's new president and CEO, Fritz Henderson. I mean, he does go on to say that today starts a new era that's focused on building the best cars in the world.

Wasn't that the last era, too?

At least it was the most recent years of that last era. Seriously. Look at the Malibu. The Traverse. The CTS. The Aura. The Astra. The 9-3. The H3. (Yes, I am including that one, shush.) There were some really good vehicles in the last couple years that I have absolutely loved. And they're just going to discount all that? The work they did to rebuild after crappy design and finish? Bah, humbug.

The General did a lot right before this bankruptcy business. And I'm still not sure that doing away with Saturn, Saab and Hummer was the best idea. I mean really, do away with Hummer but keep GMC ...where virtually everything is already duplicated in the Chevrolet lineup? Really? Isn't that what got them into trouble in the first place?

OK. So, I guess this "new era" thing has struck a chord with me.

Other than the largesse, which has rightfully been cut out, I didn't see much wrong with the direction they were already heading.

The press release declaring that today is a new day follows:

The New General Motors Company Launches Today

• GM gets back to the business of building great cars and trucks, serving customer needs
• New company created from GM's strongest assets
• Four core brands backed by the nation's largest and strongest dealer network
• Streamlined organization on a global basis for faster decisions, sharper focus on the customer
• Commitment to open communications

DETROIT - The new General Motors Company began operations today with a new corporate structure, a stronger balance sheet, and a renewed commitment to make the customer the center of everything the new GM does.

"Today marks a new beginning for General Motors, one that will allow every employee, including me, to get back to the business of designing, building and selling great cars and trucks and serving the needs of our customers," said Fritz Henderson, president and CEO. "We are deeply appreciative for the support we have received during this historic transformation, and we will work hard to repay this trust by building a successful new General Motors."

Created from the old GM's strongest operations in an asset sale approved by the bankruptcy court on July 5, the new GM is built on:

• Four core brands in the U.S. and the largest, strongest dealer network in the country,
• A fresh lineup of Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC cars, trucks and crossovers, each with leading-edge designs and technologies that matter to both consumers and the environment,
• A competitive cost structure, a cleaner balance sheet, and a stronger liquidity position that will enable GM to invest in new products, key technologies, and its future,
• A winning culture focused on customers and products.

"One thing we have learned from the last 100 days is that GM can move quickly and decisively," said Henderson. "Today, we take the intensity, decisiveness and speed of the past several months and transfer it from the triage of the bankruptcy process to the creation and operation of a new General Motors.

"Business as usual is over at GM," said Henderson. "Today starts a new era for General Motors and everyone associated with the company. Going forward, the new General Motors is fully committed to listening to customers, responding to consumer and market trends, and empowering the people closest to the customer to make the decisions. Our goal is to build more of the cars, trucks, and crossovers that customers want, and to get them to market faster than ever before."

Committed to great cars and trucks

The new General Motors launches with a clear and simple vision - to design, build and sell the best vehicles in the world.

"A successful auto company needs to focus on both the cost and the revenue sides of the business," said Henderson. "Success on the revenue side means building the stylish, high-quality, fuel-efficient vehicles that customers want - and getting them to market fast."

Despite the recent downturn, GM has maintained its cadence of strong new products. In the U.S., for example, the Chevy Camaro has surged past its rivals to lead its segment, while the new Chevy Equinox, Cadillac SRX, and Buick LaCrosse are earning strong initial reviews. Later this year, the Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon and GMC Terrain debut, followed next year by the Chevy Volt, Chevy Cruze and Cadillac CTS Coupe.

This emphasis on great new products is also reflected in the Chevy Agile now launching in Latin America, in the Chevy Cruze and Buick Excelle in Asia Pacific, and in the new Opel Astra in Europe.

Just last month, GM announced its intention to build a new small car at a plant in Orion Township, Michigan, which will add to GM's growing portfolio of fuel-efficient cars and restore approximately 1,400 jobs.

GM also has moved aggressively to develop a full range of energy-saving technologies, including advanced internal combustion engines, biofuels, fuel cells, and hybrids. The company is also a leader in the development of extended-range electric vehicles, with its first model, the Chevy Volt, currently undergoing road testing and scheduled to launch in 2010. The new GM is also taking steps to make advanced battery development a core competency, and expects to make additional announcements on this matter late this summer.

"The success of our recent launches and the exciting new vehicles and technologies we have in the pipeline are evidence of our ongoing commitment to excel at everything we do," said Henderson. "Our goal is to make each and every General Motors car, truck and crossover the best-in-class."

Stronger brands and dealers

As part of its reinvention, the new GM has also focused its resources on four core brands and a stronger, more effective dealer network.

General Motors' core brands - Chevrolet, Cadillac, Buick and GMC - will have a total of just 34 U.S. nameplates by 2010. This emphasis on fewer, better entries will enable the new GM to put more resources into each nameplate, resulting in better products and stronger marketing.

In May, the company accelerated its dealer consolidation efforts, with the goal of reducing the number of GM dealers in the U.S. from 6,000 this spring to approximately 3,600 by the end of next year. Even so, GM will still have the largest dealer network in the U.S. and GM dealers have committed to continue to improve the total customer experience for GM customers.

"We're also working on new ways to make car buying more convenient for our customers, including an innovative new partnership with eBay in California to revolutionize how people buy vehicles online," Henderson said. "Customers will be able to bid on actual vehicles just like they do in an eBay auction, including the option of choosing a predetermined 'buy it now' price. We'll be testing this and other ideas with our dealers over the next few weeks, and hope to expand and build upon them in the coming months. In all cases, our goal is to make the shopping and buying process as easy as possible for GM customers - on their time and their terms. Stay tuned."

A pledge to regain trust and confidence

General Motors Company is primarily owned by the governments of the United States, Canada and Ontario, and by a trust fund providing medical benefits to UAW retirees. Specifically, common stock will be owned by:

• U.S. Department of the Treasury: 60.8 percent
• UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust: 17.5 percent
• Canada and Ontario governments: 11.7 percent
• The old GM: 10 percent

"We are very appreciative of the support provided by the stakeholders through the transformation process. Though General Motors Company will not initially be publicly traded, we will be transparent in our financial and other reporting to further strengthen trust and confidence," said Henderson. "We expect to take the company public again as soon as practical, starting next year, and to repay our government loans as soon as possible. We are required to pay off the loans by 2015, but our goal is to repay them much sooner."

Stronger balance sheet

General Motors Company launches with a strong balance sheet, a competitive cost structure, and a strong cash position, enabling it to compete more effectively with both its U.S. and foreign-based competitors here in the U.S., and to continue its strong presence in growing global markets.

The new company acquired old GM's strongest operations and will have a competitive operating cost structure, partly as a result of recent agreements with the United Auto Workers (UAW) and Canadian Auto Workers (CAW).

In the U.S., the new GM will be a far leaner company. By the end of 2010, the company will operate 34 assembly, powertrain, and stamping plants, down from 47 in 2008, and capacity utilization is expected to reach 100 percent during 2011. Overall U.S. employment will decline from about 91,000 at the end of 2008 to about 64,000 at the end of this year, creating a company sized to respond quickly to changes in the market, while still retaining the global scope necessary to develop world-class products and technologies.

The new GM will begin with a much stronger balance sheet, including U.S. debt of approximately $11 billion, which excludes preferred stock of $9 billion, and could change under fresh-start accounting. In total, obligations have been reduced by more than $40 billion, representing mostly unsecured debt and the VEBA trust fund that provides medical benefits to UAW retirees. The stronger balance sheet and lower break-even point will allow the new GM to reduce its risk, operate profitably at much lower volume levels, and reinvest in the business in the key areas of advanced technology and product development.

GM's subsidiaries outside the United States were acquired by the new company and are expected to continue to operate normally without any interruption.

A new way of doing business

With the launch of the new General Motors, company leaders will work to change the culture of the company, making the speed and decisiveness that GM demonstrated over the past several months the new way of doing business, and adding an intensified focus on the customer.

Edward E. Whitacre, Jr., who oversaw the creation of the new AT&T, will serve as chairman of a GM board with a number of new directors. Henderson will continue as president and chief executive officer, working closely with Whitacre. He also will take responsibility for GM's operations in North America, eliminating the GM North America president position.

To speed day-to-day decision-making, two senior leadership forums, the Automotive Strategy Board and Automotive Product Board, will be replaced by a single, smaller executive committee, which will meet more frequently and focus on business results, products, brands, and customers.

Bob Lutz has agreed to join the new GM as vice chairman responsible for all creative elements of products and customer relationships. Lutz and Tom Stephens, vice chairman, product development, will work together as a team, partnering with Ed Welburn, vice president of design, to guide all creative aspects of design. GM's brands, marketing, advertising, and communications will report to Lutz for consistent messaging and results. He will report to Henderson, and be part of the newly formed executive committee.

"I am pleased to announce that we are 'unretiring' Bob Lutz so he can fill this important position in the new GM," said Henderson. "He has a proven track record of unleashing creativity in the design and development of GM cars and trucks. This new role allows him to take that passion a step further, applying it to other parts of GM that connect directly with customers."

General Motors will also end its regional operating structure, moving decisions closer to the customer. This eliminates the regional president positions and the regional strategy boards. Nick Reilly will be named executive vice president of GM International Operations (GMIO) which will be based in Shanghai.

GM is also removing layers of management - reducing the number of U.S. executives by 35 percent and overall U.S. salaried employment by 20 percent by the end of this year - flattening the organization and speeding decision making.

Additional details of the new structure and leadership moves will be communicated later this month, said Henderson. "These and other actions will simplify our organizational structure and reduce the level of bureaucracy that, in the past, has prevented GM from moving faster."

More direct communications

Henderson also announced initiatives to open more direct communications between customers and GM employees at every level. "Beginning next week, we will launch a 'Tell Fritz' website where customers, or anyone else, can share ideas, concerns, and suggestions directly with senior management. I will personally review and respond to some of these communications every day."

Henderson and other General Motors leaders will go on the road regularly to meet with consumers and others with a stake in the new GM. "In August, we'll begin regular visits with customers, dealers, suppliers, employees and others - in the U.S. and abroad - who impact our relationships with customers. We'll be listening to their ideas, and acting on the ones that will improve our ability to serve our customers better. And of course, other executives and I will continue to reach out to customers through our ongoing web and Twitter chats.

"Today we launch the new General Motors, and our promise is simple. We will be profitable, we will repay our loans as soon as possible, and our cars and trucks will be among the best in the world," said Henderson. "We recognize that we've been given a rare second chance at GM, and we are very grateful for that. And we appreciate the fact that we now have the tools to get the job done.

"To our current customers, we appreciate the confidence that you have placed in us, and going forward, we'll offer you nothing less than great cars, trucks and crossovers, with unmatched customer service. To those who have supported us through this challenging time, we are deeply grateful," said Henderson. "And to those who have never tried a GM vehicle - or who have tried one and been disappointed - we look forward to the chance to win your business and earn your trust."

Fusion Hybrid: Leaves labors won

Aaaah, but when you do it right, look at all the leafy green goodness. This SmartGauge is one of my favorite parts of the Fusion Hybrid. Instant gratification ... or shaming as the case may be.

Love the 4-color graphics as well. Ford hit this one out of the park, and other manufacturers (cough, Toyota), could learn a thing or two here.

Fusion Hybrid: Leaves labors lost

Not the best photo with my old cell phone, but you get the idea. This has to be the most depressing screen on the Fusion Hybrid. Two sparse twigs and one measely leaf.

This means you are not an economical driver.

Like that's news to me.

Backup camera in the Fusion Hybrid

I am a HUGE fan of this new trend of backup cameras. They are a downright God Send in the city of Chicago where everything is parallel parking Hell. I am especially fond of systems like that on the Fusion, which offer green, yellow and red markings to let you know how close you really are to the obstacle behind you.

The one system I like better than this: The backup cameras in the Infiniti and Nissan vehicles, in addition to the color markings, the lines actually curve so that you can see how the vehicle will move as you turn your week. A real fave.

Fusion hybrid... Starting at 0 mpg

I apologize for another crappy cell phone photo, but I am thoroughly enamored with the Focus Hybrid SmartGauge. On day one of the test, I zero'd out the mpgs, and as you can see, I started with a couple measly leaves and branches. I love the visual imagery, and after a couple days now in the vehicle, I find myself competing with the last drive I did ... can I add more leaves? What are my final stats?

I'm currently at 39.5 mpg ... so let's keep going and see how it flows.

Will try to get a better picture of the gauges.

GMC Yukon Hybrid Driving Impressions

This is a huge-ass vehicle. I forget that when it's not directly in my line of sight. But this honker seats eight. EIGHT. And we're not talking eight of me ... which would probably fit in a Mini Cooper. We're talking eight real people.

After my long run last weekend, it was actually funny. People were clamoring to ride with me because they wanted to see if they fit and how it rode. Que serra. They had a blast, and I liked seeing how they fit. Plus, I discovered that the middle-row seats don't slide and tilt all that easily to allow rear-seat passengers.

The last time I drove a large GM hybrid (the Cadillac Escalade), it was in the middle of our long stretch of sub-zero days and I could only manage to get 12 or 13 mpg. Ugh. But a lot of that had to do with the fact that it was so cold, and you need the battery to be warm to operate at an optimal level. I just wasn't getting it into autostop enough. But this time around, the weather was obviously much nicer, and the fuel economy showed it. I averaged about 18 mpg during the test week in combined city/highway driving. You'll note that's actually better than the much smaller Camaro that I was driving last week. I know, I know, apples and oranges. But I still thought it was interesting.

I really like the comfort level of the Yukon. For such a large vehicle, it's surprisingly comfortable. And, the total visibility is also surprising. I could see very well out the front and all around the vehicle.

Maneuverability was also good. But, by the nature of the beast, the turning radius wasn't stellar, and there were definitely some parking places I did not fit in. The Yukon may have driven small, but it was a large, large vehicle.

The verdict? If you really need a large vehicle (really?), I say the hybrid GMC is a good way to go. You get all the size you need and you do shrink your environmental foot print a wee bit. But, I would say this is good only if you are hauling people OR things. It won't do both simultaneously.

Love it: I was very impressed by the consistent 18 mpg fuel rating ... even though I'm not a very green driver. Optional power liftgate.

Hate it: The middle seat is difficult to tilt so that passengers can get in the rear seat. Removing the seats to have more cargo volume is damn near impossible -- especially for someone of my size. The seats weigh almost as much as me! And then where do you put them? I live in the city for Pete's sake! No garage.

Can't live without it: Running boards. I'd never get into this vehicle otherwise!

Chevrolet Camaro Driving Impressions

To borrow from Paris Hilton (cough, gag, ack): That's hot.

When the Camaro pulled up in front of the building, everyone in the office wanted a ride. And, I work mostly with women. The black paint. The orange leather seats. The slick orange inserts on the doors ... that light up at night. The ringed headlights that look slightly demonic in the dark. The sharklike nose. The slick six-speed manual transmission.

Sigh.

That's really hot.

This car pretty much makes me giddy all over. Though I have to say I didn't quite get the attention that I did when I drove the all-new Dodge Challenger for the first time. There were the points and the stares. But no one knocked on my window while I was sitting at a light. And no one asked me out on a date because I was driving such a cool car. And, yes, that did happen while in the Challenger.

Oh, well. Good thing I already have a boyfriend.

The SS model, which luckily is what the test car was, comes with a 6.2-liter V-8 engine that delivers 426 horsepower. (Insert Tim the Toolman Taylor grunt here.) And boy did it sound nice. It was a low rumble that kicked into a roar with a heavy footed acceleration. The downside: My gas mileage was about 13.4 mpg. I had to fill up the tank three times during the test period.

When I went to visit my boyfriend after driving out to the Autobahn Country Club in Joliet (no, Tony, I did not take it out on the track), the test vehicle was coated in dust. I got severely chastised, and before he would get in the car with me, he made me go get it washed. Whatever.

The verdict? I loved this car. But, I have to admit in the muscle car trio, I'm not quite sure how it stacks up. The Challenger probably wins in the flashy looks department -- especially in the Hemi Orange. And the Mustang has some phenomenal handling. But there's something very subtle, sexy and slightly menacing about the new Camaro that sucks me in.

Love it: pretty much everything.

Hate it: the gear shift that forces you to go from first to fourth gear if you're accelerating slowly, and the 13.4 mpg average mileage during the test week.

Can't live without it: the belly flip when I punch the accelerator as I merge onto the highway.

Honda Insight Driving Impressions

This car is really slick. OK. So it looks like a petite Prius. But still. I like the petiteness. (No comments from the peanut gallery here, please.)

But the problem with being so small is that I felt like I got pushed around a lot. (Ahem. Really. No comments, please). On the highway, it was like the slightest wind would blow me over. And that combined with the fact that the steering was very loose had me weaving if I didn't pay close attention.

In terms of looks alone, the Insight has a lot going for it. The interior design, for one, was really well done. The center stack and IMA gauges were really thoughtful in their simplicity and attractiveness. Everything was easy to reach, and I felt very close to everything I needed.

But I could see how this would be a problem for a bigger driver. And, I have to admit, there were times that even I felt too big or tall for the space. (Zip it.)

My absolutely favorite feature on this car was the gauge lighting on the speedometer. It turned a bright happy green when I was driving efficiently, and it turned an angry ice blue when I was being a speed demon. It was right in the line of my sight, and it was a constant reminder that I should pay more attention to my driving habits.

Another big bonus for the Insight is its accessible price point. At $19,800, it truly is the "hybrid for everyone." And when you tack on fuel economy at 40/43 mpg. Wow! Even better, I typically averaged around 48 mpg in my combined city highway driving. It would seem that the Insight would be the clear winner of the hybrid race that's brewing.

Not so much.

First off, the Insight is a mild hybrid. Which means that the engine will turn off when at a complete stop. But you can't drive in electric-only mode. And this is huge in a metropolitan area like Chicago. There's a lot of stop and go traffic that can keep you coasting at 15 to 20 mph for several miles at a time. And if you're in a full hybrid, and the battery is charged that's a lot of electric-only driving.

But it's when you get into the ride and handling and the overall execution of the hybrid that the real dirt starts to surface.

I already mentioned that I felt like I got pushed around on the highway and that the steering was loose. But the Insight also had a stiffer suspension than I would have expected, and every nick and groove in the road was clearly evident.

Then there were a couple things I didn't like about the hybrid part itself.

The on and off of the engine was a major downer. It was very evident and, honestly, downright clunky. I expected a smoother transition, but every off and on was a stutter and a shutter. After being in hybrids from Toyota, Ford and GM, this was an obvious oversight from Honda, and I was more than a little bit disappointed.

And I can't really call this a problem, but it is definitely worth noting: If you're in Eco Mode and you have the air conditioning on, it switches to fan only when you're at a stop and the engine shuts off. I didn't mind this too much because I'm always cold, but there were a couple of HOT days during the test period, and my dad was visiting. I thought he was going to melt. I get the whole conservation purpose of this (it is Eco Mode after all), but it's kind of unpleasant.

The verdict? I liked it but didn't love it. I think it opens up the world of hybrids to a whole new buyer at a whole new price point, which is great. But I think the execution could have been a wee bit better.

Love it: cool blue gauges, comfortable and attractive cloth seats, simple yet attractive interior design, easy to open and close rear hatch.

Hate it: the clunky on/off of the engine when the hybrid system kicks in, the feeling of being pushed around on the highway.

Can't live without it: green-and-blue lighting on the speedometer that clues you in to when you're driving well.

Camaro gauges at night

I know this crappy cell phone photo doesn't do the Camaro gauges justice, but I figured I'd try to share anyway. I really like the blue-and-red combo, and I thought it was really nice visual eye candy. Other than the orange door inserts that lit up at night, these gauges were one of my favorite interior features.

Even Giants Stumble

All of us have challenges. Sometimes we stumble. But at least it's usually only those closest to us who notice. And, in the grand scheme of things, it's not that big of a deal. We get up, we dust ourselves, and we keep going.

When an icon like General Motors stumbles, everyone notices. But sometimes people like me need to see the big guy fail … and then see him get back up again. It's actually a great life lesson. As The General dusts himself off, look for these three products to help our American giant keep going ...

To keep reading, view the article on MakeItBetter.Net.

Insight Eco Rating

No matter what I did during the test period, I could NOT raise my eco score. I was getting 48 mpg in many instances and yet when I turned off the car, I'd get this puny twig. Boo.

This is one of those instances where it could have lied to me and I would have been much happier. I know I'm not the greenest driver. But I really tried. And I was doing a lot of driving between the Chicago and Wilmette and Wheeling during the test period. A good amount of cruise controlled highway driving and light-footed acceleration. Honest.

Yet all I got was a puny twig for an eco score.

Honda Insight Center Stack

So, one of the things that Honda did really well with the new Insight is the design of the center stack. The cool blue lighting. The simple structure. Everything here is well placed and highly attractive. I was enthralled before I even put the car in drive.

There are some things I didn't like about the inside (driving impressions to come) ... but the interior is not one of them. From the soft cloth seating surfaces to the overall fit and finish, this is incredibly easy on the eyes.

And with a base price of $19,800 and an EPA mpg rating of 40/43 ... you almost can't beat it in the hybrid arena.

Koenigsegg to buy Saab?

I have to tell you I let out a HUGE sigh of relief when I read this tweet from @GMVolt: Koenigsegg to Buy Saab and Build Electric Supercar. Relief because I'm rooting for the General to survive. But also relief because the Saab 9-3 happens to be my favorite every-day car. I would shed real tears if it went away.

Not only does the deal call for the Saab brand to be maintained, but there's also new product slated. Hot damn!

Below is an abbreviated version of the press release:


General Motors and Koenigsegg Group AB Reach Tentative Agreement on Saab

Zurich -- General Motors Corp. and Koenigsegg Group AB, a consortium led by Koenigsegg Automotive AB, today confirmed the details of a memorandum of understanding for the purchase of Saab Automobile AB that secures Saab’s future.

The sale, expected to close by the end of the third quarter of this year, includes an expected $600 million funding commitment from the European Investment Bank (EIB) guaranteed by the Swedish government. Additional support is to be provided by GM and Koenigsegg Group AB to fund Saab's operations and product program investments. This includes plans to launch several new products that are in the final stages of development. Saab had filed for reorganization under Swedish Law on Feb. 20, 2009. This tentative agreement is a key milestone for Saab to successfully emerge from its reorganization process.

As part of the proposed transaction, GM will continue to provide Saab with architecture and powertrain technology during a defined time period. Additionally, Saab plans to produce its next generation 9-5 models in the Saab production facility in Trollhättan, Sweden.

The sale will be subject to customary closing conditions, including receipt of applicable regulatory, governmental and court approvals. Other terms and conditions specific to the sale are not being disclosed at this time. Deutsche Bank acted as financial advisor to General Motors Corporation.

Aston Martin DB9 Is Plush Though Slightly Impractical

The car was right out front, and the key fob was in my hand. So, it wasn't like I needed the valet to do anything. Yet, when he saw the direction I was heading, he nearly tripped over himself to get to the car before me so that he could open the door. He half bowed as I slid behind the wheel.

Then again, I was driving a 2009 Aston Martin DB9 Volante, so I didn't blame him for being overeager to get a glimpse inside the car. Because of the $198,200 price point, you just don't see these cars on the road every day.

The DB9 Volante is the Armani of the car world. It's one of those delectable dishes that is both the height of fashion and the pinnacle of performance. It's subtle yet stunning, and it is a definite attention-getter. It's like an accessory that every woman should have.

Read the rest of the review on MakeItBetter.net.

2009 Ford Edge Sport

Whenever I pick up my boyfriend in a new test vehicle, the first words out of his mouth are: “So, how do you like it?”

Behind the wheel of the 2009 Ford Edge Sport, I shrugged and said: “I like it.”

He looked at me with brows raised, the unspoken “and” hanging in the air.

"And, I like it."

I mean, there isn’t a lot of snazz and pizzazz with the Edge, but it’s a solid vehicle with attractive styling and decent acceleration. It’s comfortable. There’s excellent visibility out all windows. You’ve got 69 cubic-feet of storage with the rear seats down.

I like it.

It’s also a little bit clunky in terms of ride and handling and a little plain on the inside, but that really wasn’t enough to turn me off completely. So maybe it didn’t sing for me, but I like it.

To read the rest of this review, visit SearchChicago - Autos at: http://searchchicago.suntimes.com/autos/research/ciminillo/1618434,061109-ford-edge2.article

2009 Lincoln MKS

It seemed like a good idea at the time. I was visiting my sister in Indianapolis (i.e. cheap sales tax), and I decided it was time to get a new TV. One problem: The box that houses a 40-inch TV isn’t quite compatible with an 18.7-cubic-foot trunk.

Luckily I was test driving a 2009 Lincoln MKS, which has a huge back seat and nice wide-opening rear doors. Even though the MKS fit my new TV perfectly, I’m pleased to report it’s much more than just a hauler for inanimate objects.

On the trek to Indy, I encountered hideous traffic. Not only was it a holiday weekend, but there was also construction on Interstate 65. It also happened to be the day before the Indianapolis 500.

So I had plenty of time to assess the comfort level of the driver’s seat. From the supple leather seats to the highly adjustable lumbar support, I was perfectly comfortable. My driving position was perfect, and visibility was excellent.

To read the rest of the story, Go to SearchChicago - Autos at: http://searchchicago.suntimes.com/autos/research/ciminillo/1607824,060409-Lincoln-MKS2.article

Saturn to be purchased by Penske?

As long as Saturn lives, I'm not sure that I care who buys it. The first car I bought was a 1997 Saturn SC1, and I loved her. Harriet (Sweet, Harriet) was a great car who got me through my move to Chicago. So, I'll always have a soft spot here. Not to mention the fact that I love the new Astra and Aura ... Saturn has a great lineup that deserves to live on.

Oh, and as an FYI, the release below doesn't say this, but Penske also owns Smart USA.

So, below is the press release GM sent out regarding a potential deal:


Detroit -- General Motors Corp. and Penske Automotive Group today confirmed details of a proposed transaction under which Penske would acquire the Saturn brand. If completed, the deal would save more than 350 dealerships and 13,000 jobs at Saturn and its retailers in the United States, and would preserve the customer-focused Saturn brand.

The proposed transaction is part of GM’s rebuilding efforts outlined in the viability plan that was submitted to the U.S. government earlier this year. Under the terms in the memorandum of understanding, Penske would obtain the rights to the brand as well as certain other Saturn assets. GM would continue production, on a contract basis, of the Saturn Aura, Vue and Outlook.

Saturn began selling cars in 1990 and has sold more than 4 million vehicles. More than 80 percent of those vehicles are still in operation, according to data from R.L. Polk. Saturn has regularly scored among the industry leaders for non-luxury brands in customer satisfaction surveys.

The transaction is expected to close in the third quarter of this year and is subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals. Financial terms of the agreement will not be disclosed at this time.

2010 Volvo XC60

I watched the car back up and then move forward again, only to stop abruptly. After a couple seconds, the driver put it in reverse, switched it into drive and went a little bit more quickly. Perhaps about 10 mph. Then stopped abruptly again.

There were a series of striped plastic barriers in front of the car, and each time the car backed up and went forward, it stopped suddenly about an inch from the barrier. Every time.

After watching the back-forth sequence for several runs, I finally asked what was happening. It was a demo of City Safety in the 2010 Volvo XC60.

City Safety is the newest safety innovation from Volvo utilizing an infrared laser sensor that determines if you are approaching a vehicle from behind too fast. If the driver fails to brake, the car will brake for the driver. The hope is to avoid the collision altogether, but if that isn’t possible, the system also activates interior restraints at the same time to protect the driver in case of a collision.

Nice in theory, but does it really work? Yes. I hopped behind the wheel of the demo car and tentatively drove toward the barriers, then stopped with a jerk without any input from my right foot. So, I tried again going a little faster. And stopped abruptly again.

This safety feature is for speeds around 10 mph because as Volvo points out, 75 percent of all collisions occur at speeds up to 18 mph, and half of these occur in city traffic.

What a brilliant idea. And it’s standard.

This feature alone is enough for me to issue a blanket statement encouraging you to check out this car. But when you add in the attractive design and functional yet comfortable interior, the 2010 XC60 becomes a must-test if you’re looking for a luxury crossover.

The XC60 comes equipped with a 3.0-liter, six-cylinder turbocharged engine that delivers 281 horsepower and 295 pound-feet of torque. For a crossover, this was more than enough power to make this car seem almost peppy for its size. Even though this is a small crossover, don’t let that fool you into thinking that means excellent fuel economy. We’re still talking about a six-cylinder engine and 4,174 pounds of vehicle. Thus, city/highway fuel economy rings in at 16/22 mpg.

The ride in the XC60 was more luxury than sporty. The steering, however, was tight, stiff and responsive, which is great for most driving situations. Until you parallel park. Then the steering is a bit too tight and stiff.

Volvo has a reputation for safety, and City Safety is just one of a multitude of features that are working to keep you and your family safe. Other standard safety features include dual stage airbags, inflatable side curtains, Whiplash Protection System, front side-impact airbags and Side Impact Protection System.

The Volvo XC60 is only offered as an all-wheel drive model, and it is very well-equipped without any options. Non-safety standard features include a six-speed Geartronic automatic transmission, leather seats, complimentary factory scheduled maintenance for the first three years, power front seats, Bluetooth, HD radio, USB interface, Sirius Satellite Radio and 18-inch wheels.

While you get a lot, you’re going to pay a pretty penny for it. Base price on the XC60 is $38,025, including destination. Luckily, you probably won’t need to add many options and could probably end there. The test vehicle added metallic paint ($525); navigation with rear park assist camera ($2,700); and the Climate Package including heated front and rear seats, heated windshield washer nozzles and high-pressure headlamp cleaning system ($1,000).

I often find that the shape of Volvos is a bit off-putting. Yet the XC60 smoothes out some of Volvo’s harsh edges, ending up with an almost curvaceous profile. The bumped out taillights, which can be a bit jarring on other models, actually work on this crossover.

The interior of the XC60 is sleek and simple, and the modern design is oddly calming. Everything is in the right place, and the control panel on the center stack is intuitive and well-organized. My favorite interior feature is the storage compartment behind the slim center stack, and I could easily store my small purse here when I had passengers.

As far as crossovers go, the XC60 had pretty much everything I could possibly want or need. As a base model it was well equipped, and I’d probably only add the Climate Package to get the heated front seats, which would keep the final price under $40K. This is a comfortable car that has plenty of storage and plenty of passenger room. Add that to plenty of safety, and you have a hands-down winner if the price tag is in your budget.

** Originally published in print in the Chicago Sun-Times on May 29.

Reaction to GM's Bankruptcy

So, my tweet this morning, which ended up on my facebook page, got some good response from my facebook friends. And I wanted to share in the hopes of getting more comments ... so, read and respond! Here's the stream ... names have been changed to protect the innocent.

Jill Ciminillo wonders how you feel about the fact that the government will have a 60 percent stake in GM after the bankruptcy.


Kermit the Frog at 8:19am June 1
I'm concerned that Government Motors is going to try and force unpopular small cars on a public that will not be willing to buy them.

I'm also worried about the death of any exciting vehicles. I have NO desire to drive joyless transportation pods.

The Cookie Monster at 8:25am June 1
I didn't realize GM had been putting forth any really exciting vehicles lately - or certainly not any that are actually on the showroom floor.

Big Bird at 9:15am June 1
No, GM doesn't have anything as exciting as Toyota! Corvettes are boring and with all that HP and only getting about 26mpg, highway. I'd rather have an EXCITING Camry. A Cadillac CTS-V, all 556 horses were SO BORING when I launched it to 60 in 3.9 seconds... (That's a sedan, a car with 4 doors) Again, I was dreaming of driving an Avalon! The new ... Read MoreCamaro SS was so boring, too. Especially launching it to 120mph at the track and only having to brake so I could stay on pavement. Honestly, I was left pining for a Solara... sigh

Big Bird at 9:45am June 1
And, Jill... don't like it but what can you do? I have an even bigger issue with the UAW having .1% of them.

Snuffaluffagus at 10:26am June 1
Will never buy another GM or Chrysler product. They have taken enough of my money already. Most of their cars are foreign made anyways. I will stick with my more American Toyota.

Miss Piggy at 10:46am June 1
I think it's sad. But the American people don't care about supporting our own economy, and this is what it comes down to. It trickles down to all the "Made in China" junk people buy as well instead of forking over a few extra bucks for something made in the U.S. I do like the new Camaro. I still miss my old one.

Big Bird at 11:39am June 1
I'm all for a free market. But buy based on facts, not untruths. It's a fact, GM's dealer network has created a lot of unsatisfied customers. I've seen the good and the bad over my lifetime. It's also a fact that they have plenty of good product in the showroom, TODAY. My bigger fear is, this Wal-Mart America we live in, looks an awful lot like Germany in the early 30's. Marching straight down a path to self-destruction. The difference being, our government can't bail us out of this one, too.

Aston Martin DB9

I had just a little more than 48 hours. And, I have to admit, my heart leapt in my chest when I saw it. Forty-eight hours wasn’t nearly enough time.

But at least there was a long drive to Indianapolis in my future. Just more than 400 miles of pavement. That was definitely something to look forward to. I wouldn’t think of goodbye.

So, I hopped behind the wheel of the 2009 Aston Martin DB9 Volante and smiled with pure glee. I did, after all, have 48 hours behind the wheel of this test vehicle that had a price tag topping $208,000, and I was determined to eke out every ounce of enjoyment possible.

Before starting the car or even adjusting my seat, I had to touch everything. The leather of the steering wheel was smooth and supple, and the suede ceiling almost melted under my touch. The wood paneling had a shiny matte finish that felt like actual wood, and the knobs and dials on the center stack were actual metal. They tinked musically as I flicked my fingernails along the edges. The biggest surprise was the ashtray within the optional smoking kit. It was a removable glass bowl.

I was stunned. Every detail from the carefully hand-stitched seats right down to the lowly ashtray was breathtakingly planned and executed.

But the clock was ticking and a precious 10 minutes had already passed. So, I took the clear-topped key with the Aston Martin emblem below the glasslike covering and pushed it into the key slot on the dash, which doubles as an ignition. The engine roared to life.

The DB9 comes equipped with a 5.9-liter V-12 engine that delivers 470 horsepower, and its low, strong growl is absolutely lyrical. The thing that amazed me about this engine is that with all the power it held, it was just as beautifully executed as the interior design. Often with such power comes sudden and clumsy acceleration. Sudden and clumsy due to driver error. Yet, with the DB9, no matter how clumsily I stomped on the gas pedal, the acceleration was smooth and downright beautiful.

I had miles of open highway to play, and 55 mph seemed like I was crawling along. Luckily, once out of the immediate Chicago area, I-65 has a speed limit of 70 mph, and I was able to cruise effortlessly at something a little more than that.

For the three-hour drive to Indy, the driver’s seat was steadily comfortable, and the heated seats remained a nice warm consistent temperature.

Because the test vehicle was the DB9 Volante, that means it was a convertible. Like everything else, it was beautifully executed. With a push of the button the top flowed down into a compartment into the trunk. It was a bit chilly during the brief test period, but I did manage a couple of jaunts with the top down. For the bulk of my trip, however, the top was up. Which gave me plenty of time to analyze any wind noise that might escape in through the canvas top. Amazingly, due to the three layers under the canvas top, the DB9 Volante was quieter than most sedans.

Much as I absolutely loved this car, I have to admit there were a couple little things that put a damper on my mood. I figured that a car topping $200K would have beat pretty much every mundane issue one might encounter in a mere vehicle. But that was not the case. The first thing I noticed was the heaviness of the trunk and lack of handhold to open the lid. It unlatched with a click of the key fob, but it didn’t automatically raise. I had to grip the ledge above the license plate to raise the trunk, and it was a bit awkward given the weight of the metal lid. Plus, there’s always the concern that I could scratch the pearlescent white paint.

The second thing I noted was the fact that the windows were auto down … but not auto up. With everything else so meticulously executed, this was more of a surprise than an annoyance. If a $20K car can do this, why not a $200K one?

It boggles my mind that there could possibly be options on this car. But there were about $10K of extras that were listed on the sticker sheet. The base price for the DB9 Volante is $198,200, and the test vehicle added a plethora of items such as the optional smokers kit, 19-inch 15-spoke wheels, carpet color, contrast stitching and perforated leather seat insert. The final price of the test vehicle including the $2,100 gas guzzler fee was $208,970.

On the drive to my sister’s house in Indy, I called and warned her that I had something special. And the weekend was filled with driving to birthday parties and first communions to show off the most expensive car I’ve had the pleasure to keep overnight. The gear heads had to look under the hood, and the awestruck needed a ride around the block. Everyone wanted to hear the engine and sit in driver’s seat.

I learned several things during my short time behind the wheel. First, the quiet beauty of the DB9 Volante is definitely a head turner to those who know what they’re looking at. Second, someone who is 6-foot, 10-inches cannot fit behind the wheel. Well, he can, but he looks like a giant with knees cradling the sides of the steering wheel.

I also learned that I could quite happily trade my condo for this car. It was gorgeous and a dream to drive. When reality hit on Monday morning, I reluctantly turned over the jewellike key fob and watched the taillights disappear down my alley.

For me it’s nice to know such stunning works of automotive art exist. Even if I’ll never make enough money to own one. Sigh.

2009 Dodge Charger

The first thing I noted about the 2009 Dodge Charger was the comfort. Usually I get behind the wheel of a Chrysler product, and I’m instantly in an awkward position. The steering wheel, the seat, the gearshift are all in places that just aren’t optimal.

Yet, when I slid behind the wheel of the Charger, I experienced instant comfort. And I was surprised.

For the rest of the review, visit SearchChicago - Autos.

2009 Volkswagen CC

With the long lean lines, couplike styling and downward sloping hood, you could almost swear you were looking at a Mercedes-Benz CLS-Class. Instead, it was the all-new 2009 Volkswagen CC. And it costs $40,000 less.

I was smitten with the CC before I even drove it simply because of its classy, elegant styling. Getting behind the wheel, however, was slightly anticlimactic. Don’t get me wrong; I liked it. But I didn’t love it as much as I hoped I would.

To read the rest of the review, visit SearchChicago - Autos.

2009 Mini Cooper Convertible

Mini has the tendency to make quirky cool. And, from the Union Jack that can be painted on the roof to the large speedometer appearing on the center stack that inspires back-seat drivers everywhere, there’s a plethora of quirk in a Mini Cooper.

The newest tool in the cool box: the Openometer. This gauge shows up behind the steering wheel on the 2009 Mini Cooper Convertible and displays the amount of time you drive around topless. Well, not you personally, but the car.

To read the rest of the story, visit SearchChicago - Autos at: http://tr.im/kQqR

2009 BMW 750i

If there’s one thing you should know about BMW it’s this: It makes a phenomenal driver’s vehicle. Each BMW is meant to be driven to the fullest, which I would expect from the sportier, tinier cars in the lineup. But when you see it in vehicles like the X6 and 7-Series, it’s pretty awesome.

In a recent test of the 2009 750i I was constantly amazed by its fleet-footed acceleration and relative alacrity. It drove like a much smaller car. But make no mistake, at 199.8 inches, this is a large sedan. Longer than many SUVs, actually. So its nimbleness was quite surprising. From my tight condo parking space to narrow Chicago alleys, I found that I could maneuver the test car quite well.

To read the rest of the story, go to SearchChicago - Autos at: http://tr.im/kr2V

The focus is fuel economy

At a recent Midwest Automotive Media Association dinner hosted by Chevrolet, Ed Peper gave a very compelling speech about the state of affairs at Chevrolet. While he acknowledged tough times ahead, the overall prospects for the brand look good. Especially since the new focus is fuel economy, fuel economy, fuel economy.

In fact, Chevrolet announced today that the 2010 Equinox SUV is expected to deliver an estimated 32 mpg on the highway with a 2.4-liter four-cylinder engine. This means you can travel about 600 miles on a single tank of gas. While final EPA estimates aren't out, the expected city/highway mileage when the Equinox hits the streets in June will be 22/32 mpg. This is significantly better than the Honda CR-V (20/27 mpg) and the Toyota RAV-4 (22/28 mpg).

With all the focus on efficiency, one of my twitter friends raised a very good question: What about the Corvette? With only V-8 engine options, you're looking at a best case scenario of 26 mpg on the highway.

During the dinner, Peper had good words for the Camaro and several of the all-new smaller offerings from Chevrolet like the Cruze and Orlando ... but nary a word about Corvette. Anyone out there who can weigh in on this?

Does Corvette have a future? I sure as hell hope so.

2010 Lexus RX 350

I have to admit Lexus has done such a great job with its vehicles that they’ve actually become a bit boring. So well made. So luxurious. So comfortable. So uninspiring. So predictable.

Which is why sliding behind the wheel of the 2010 RX 350 was such a nice surprise.

This benchmark crossover may look familiar with the shape that launched the segment, but don’t let that fool you. This vehicle is all new for 2010, and it has raised the bar again.

I’m typically not a fan of anything larger than a coupe for my personal use, but after driving the RX 350 for a week, it has joined the Nissan Maxima on my top-pick list.

Read the rest of the review on SearchChicago - Autos at: http://tr.im/keMT.

PHOTO: Wrangler winches from a distance

PHOTO: New plan: turn X5 around and go back the way it came

PHOTO: Except for winch, X5 would have slid down backwards

PHOTO: X5 slips even more

PHOTO: Wrangler prepares to winch X5

PHOTO: Land Rover guys try to re-trench for X5

PHOTO: BMW X5 starts to slide

PHOTO: Line of cars waiting to go off-road

PHOTO: BMW X5 heads into stuck

PHOTO: Off-road at Road America

Looking down a steep slope in a Hummer H3T ...

PHOTO: 2010 Land Rover LR4

PHOTO: 2010 Land Rover LR4

PHOTO: 2009 Rolls-Royce Phantom

PHOTO: Volvo XC60 safety demo

PHOTO: Volvo XC60 safety demo

PHOTO: 2010 Nissan 370z

PHOTO: Porsche 911 Carrera 4S

PHOTO: Porsche 911 Carrera 4S